Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;19(6):767–772. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw257

Table 2.

Censored Regression Model Regressing Bid for E-Cigarette

Dependent variable = bid for single-use e-cigarette Dependent variable = bid for e-cigarette kit
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Intercepta 5.47** (1.82) 4.59** (1.78) 10.57* (4.04) 7.90* (3.85)
Participant received only video information (relative to control), N = 110 (27%) −1.28 (0.93) −1.44 (0.88) 0.25 (2.15) −0.09 (1.89)
Participant received only print information (relative to TV only), N = 110 (27%) 0.79b (0.93) 0.49b (0.89) 3.26 (2.15) 2.39 (1.91)
Participant received both print ad and TV ad (relative to TV only), N = 99 (24%) 0.80b (0.94) 0.10 (0.89) 3.89 (2.16) 1.85 (1.91)
Self-rated health (mean = 2.66, SD = 0.90) −0.62 (0.37) −0.41 (0.35) −1.80* (0.85) −1.27 (0.76)
Age (mean = 41.1, SD = 14.3) 0.00 (0.02) 0.01 (0.02) 0.05 (0.05) 0.08 (0.05)
Female, N = 175 (43%) 0.12 (0.67) 0.38 (0.64) −0.55 (1.54) 0.30 (1.37)
Income—below $30000, N = 212 (52%) 0.37 (0.71) 0.41 (0.67) 1.67 (1.63) 1.80 (1.45)
Income—between $30000 and $60000, N = 57 (15%) 0.76 (1.03) −0.11 (0.97) 3.69 (2.34) 1.05 (2.07)
Education level (mean = 1.60, SD = 1.12) 0.29 (0.29) 0.40 (0.27) 0.92 (0.66) 1.35* (0.59)
Race_black, N = 136 (33%) 0.50 (0.82) 0.81 (0.78) −1.73 (1.88) −1.15 (1.68)
Race_other, N = 29 (7%) 3.62** (1.36) 4.14** (1.29) 0.98 (3.12) 1.65 (2.78)
Participant is from Buffalo, N = 213 (52%) 1.24 (0.78) 0.84 (0.75) 5.22** (1.79) 4.05* (1.61)
BMI (mean = 28.2, SD = 6.9) −0.11* (0.05) −0.12** (0.05) −0.17 (0.11) −0.19* (0.10)
Participant is worried quality of life may be lower because of smoking, N = 234 (57%) −0.29 (0.62) −0.81 (1.33)
Participant has ever used an e-cigarette, N = 209 (52%) 0.72 (0.63) 2.12 (1.34)
Log likelihood −1220 −1162 −1550 −1464

BMI = body mass index. SE in parentheses. N = 409.

aAuctions conducted from March to November 2014. N = 409.

bCoefficient for those who saw print ad only is different from the coefficient for those who saw video ad only and that difference is statistically significant at the 5% level.

*p < .05; **p < .01.