Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2016 Oct 26;55(1):502–525. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2610522

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Total calculated mean liquid water and ice cloud retrieval uncertainties binned as a function of COT and CER for all successful retrievals from the central U.S. granule shown in (a). COT uncertainties (b, e) are relatively higher at small and large COT with sensitivity to CER only for the smallest sizes. CER uncertainties (c,d,f,g) are generally higher at small COT and CER. Grey-shaded bins either indicate effective radius values outside the LUT or the absence of pixels in the granule with that COT-CER retrieval pair. Contours of normalized retrieval counts for the COT and CER pairs are also shown.