Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;43(2):105–119. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx096

Table I.

Youth Demographic and Spina Bifida Information at Time 1, by Ethnicity

Characteristic Total M (SD) or N (%) Non-Latino Caucasian M (SD) or N (%) Latino M (SD) or N (%) Non-Latino Caucasian vs. Latino
Participants 113 (100%) 74 (65.5%) 39 (33.5%)
Age 11.53 (2.41) 11.31 (2.34) 11.95 (2.53) t(111) = –1.34ns
Gender: male 54 (47.8%) 35 (47.3%) 19 (48.7%) χ2(1) = 0.02ns
Spina bifida type
 Myelomeningocele 98 (86.7%) 64 (86.5%) 34 (87.2%) χ2(1) = 0.01ns
 Lipomeningocele 7 (6.2%) 4 (5.4%) 3 (7.7%)
 Other 7 (6.2%) 6 (8.1%) 1 (2.6%)
 Unknown/not reported 1 (0.9%) 0 (0%) 1 (2.6%)
Lesion level
 Thoracic 21 (18.6%) 11 (14.9%) 10 (25.6%) χ2(1) = 2.16ns
 Lumbar 54 (47.8%) 37 (50.0%) 17 (43.6%)
 Sacral 34 (30.1%) 24 (32.4%) 10 (25.6%)
 Unknown/not reported 4 (3.5%) 2 (2.7%) 2 (5.2%)
Shunt present 88 (77.9%) 56 (75.7%) 32 (82.1%) χ2(1) = 0.60ns
IQa 86.83 (0.12) 92.41 (19.87) 75.83 (15.78) t(105) = 4.35***
Family SESb 40.07 (16.35) 46.95 (13.52) 25.29 (11.43) t(105) = 8.09***

Note.an = 107 for the total sample owing to missing data (non-Latino Caucasian n = 71; Latino n = 36). bn = 107 for the total sample owing to missing data (non-Latino Caucasian n = 73; Latino n = 34). IQ = WASI estimated full-scale IQ; SES = socioeconomic status measured by Hollingshead Four Factor Index. ***p < .001, nsnot significant.