Table V.
Results From Alternative SEM Assessing Relationship Between Child HRQL and Parent Emotional Functioning by Rater
Pathway | Parent-proxy report |
Child report |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unstandardized estimate (SE) | Standardized estimate (SE) | Unstandardized estimate (SE) | Standardized estimate (SE) | |
Direct effects | ||||
Child PF → Child worry | – | – | – | – |
Child EF → Child worry | −0.23 (0.07)*** | −0.25 (0.07)*** | −0.53 (0.15)*** | −0.36 (0.09)*** |
Child RF → Child worry | – | – | −0.25 (0.1)*** | −0.25 (0.09)*** |
Child PF → Parent EF | – | – | – | – |
Child EF → Parent EF | 0.45 (0.07)*** | 0.51 (0.06)*** | 0.46 (0.11)*** | 0.35 (0.07)*** |
Child RF → Parent EF | – | – | – | – |
Child worry → Parent EF | −0.18 (0.07)*** | −0.19 (0.07)*** | – | – |
Indirect effects | ||||
Child PF → Child worry → Parent EF | – | – | – | – |
Child EF → Child worry → Parent EF | 0.04 (0.02)** | 0.05 (0.02)** | – | – |
Child RF → Child worry → Parent EF | – | – | – | – |
Note. Models adjusted for child and parent age, child and parent gender, complications by 45 days, and study/intervention assignment.
EF = emotional functioning; PF = physical functioning; RF = role functioning; SEM = structural equation modeling; HRQL = health-related quality of life.
p < .1, **p < .05, ***p < .01.