Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;42(7):804–814. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx047

Table V.

Results From Alternative SEM Assessing Relationship Between Child HRQL and Parent Emotional Functioning by Rater

Pathway Parent-proxy report
Child report
Unstandardized estimate (SE) Standardized estimate (SE) Unstandardized estimate (SE) Standardized estimate (SE)
Direct effects
Child PF → Child worry
Child EF → Child worry −0.23 (0.07)*** −0.25 (0.07)*** −0.53 (0.15)*** −0.36 (0.09)***
Child RF → Child worry −0.25 (0.1)*** −0.25 (0.09)***
Child PF → Parent EF
Child EF → Parent EF 0.45 (0.07)*** 0.51 (0.06)*** 0.46 (0.11)*** 0.35 (0.07)***
Child RF → Parent EF
Child worry → Parent EF −0.18 (0.07)*** −0.19 (0.07)***
Indirect effects
Child PF → Child worry → Parent EF
Child EF → Child worry → Parent EF 0.04 (0.02)** 0.05 (0.02)**
Child RF → Child worry → Parent EF

Note. Models adjusted for child and parent age, child and parent gender, complications by 45 days, and study/intervention assignment.

EF  =  emotional functioning; PF  =  physical functioning; RF  =  role functioning; SEM = structural equation modeling; HRQL = health-related quality of life.

*

p < .1, **p < .05, ***p < .01.