Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 6;13:595–606. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S157224

Table 1.

Characteristics of the participants and functional fitness results in both the exercise groups, at baseline and after the 24-week exercise intervention

Factors Exercise group 1 (EG1) N=15
Exercise group 2 (EG2) N=13
p<0.05
Baseline
After intervention
Baseline
After intervention
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Body weight (N) 653.01±81.23 647.78±80.04 676.3±88.8 674.0±82.8
Body mass index (kg/m2) 27.2±3.5 26.4±3.3 28.0±2.5 27.6±2.6
Vigorous walking (score units) 5.3±12.0 9.7±12.6 15.4±16.2 9.6±9.6
Walking (score units) 9.3±5.2 11.2±7.7 13.0±12.8 18.6±13.7 ¤
Moving (score units) 10.5±3.2 11.2±2.4 12.8±1.4 13.1±1.5 ¥
Standing (score units) 7.9±1.8 8.4±1.9 9.0±1.0 9.3±1.0
Sitting (score units) 2.3±0.8 2.3±0.8 2.3±0.5 2.1±0.5
YPAS total (score units) 51.3±12.6 42.7±16.5 52.4±17.8 52.6±15.4
30 sec chair-stand (number of repetitions) 15.3±3.7 16.4±2.8 16.3±3.1 21.2±5.8 ¥,§
8 ft up&go (score units) 5.5±1.2 5.0±0.7 4.8±0.8 5.1±0.8
2-min walking (score units) 105.9±21.4 111.7±17.5 110.8±21.5 111.8±25.1
FAB1 (score units) 4.00±0.0 4.0±0.0 4.0±0.0 4.0±0.0
FAB2 (score units) 3.3±1.0 3.7±0.5 3.3±1.0 3.6±0.7
FAB3 (score units) 3.2±1.2 3.3±1.2 3.3±1.0 3.3±0.8
FAB4 (score units) 3.7±1.0 3.7±0.6 3.9±0.3 3.9±0.3

Notes:

¥

Significant differences between EG1 and EG2 after intervention;

¤

significant differences between baseline and after intervention in EG1;

§

significant differences between baseline and after intervention in EG2. “30 sec chair-stand” (CS), lower limbs strength test; “8 foot up&go” (UP), agility test; “2-min walking”, aerobic endurance test; FAB1 and FAB2, dynamic balance tests; FAB3 and FAB4, static balance tests.

Abbreviations: EG, exercise group; YPAS, Yale Physical Activity Survey.