Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195652

Table 3. Compliance of reporting to the STRICTA checklist.

Items Total
(n = 318, %)
Chinese
(n = 264, %)
English
(n = 54, %)
Acupuncture rationale
47.Style of acupuncture 27 (8.5) 3 (1.1) 24 (44.4)
48.Reason for the treatment 45 (14.2) 20 (7.6) 25 (46.3)
49.Extent to which treatment was varied 4 (1.3) 2 (0.8) 2 (3.7)
Details of needling
50.Number of needle insertions per subject 262 (82.4) 238 (90.2) 24 (44.4)
51.Names of the points 285 (89.6) 241 (91.3) 44 (81.5)
52.Depth of insertion 151 (47.5) 110 (41.7) 41 (75.9)
53.Responses sought 252 (79.2) 210 (79.5) 42 (77.8)
54.Needle stimulation 241 (75.8) 198 (75.0) 43 (79.6)
55.Needle retention time 275 (86.5) 235 (89.0) 40 (74.1)
56.Needle type 252 (79.2) 209 (79.2) 43 (79.6)
Treatment regimen
57.Number of treatment sessions 288 (90.6) 248 (93.9) 40 (74.1)
58.Frequency and duration of treatment sessions 292 (91.8) 251 (95.1) 41 (75.9)
Other components of treatment
59. Details of other interventions 59 (18.6) 51 (19.3) 8 (14.8)
60.Setting and context of treatment 48 (15.1) 40 (15.2) 8 (14.8)
Practitioner background
61.Practitioner background 23 (7.2) 1 (0.4) 22 (40.7)
Control or comparator interventions
62.Rationale for the control 29 (9.1) 5 (1.9) 24 (65.6)
63.Precise description of the control 265 (83.3) 232 (87.9) 33 (61.1)
Summarized scores
STRICTA 9 (8–10) 9 (8–10) 9 (7–11)
Total scores a 24 (21–27) 23 (21–26) 25 (28–38)

a: The score was calculate based on the items of the standard CONSORT, CONSORT Extension for Trials Assessing Non-Pharmacological Treatments and STRICTA checklist

: Score was showed as Median (interquartile range)