Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195719

Table 2. Estimated strength of SNP IVs and susceptibility to weak instrument bias using the two-sample Mendelian randomization approach for estimating the association between lipids and AAA risk.

Exposure # of SNP IVs SNP-lipid summary estimate source r2* F Beta (P-value) Sample overlap Bias under null Type I error rate
LDL cholesterol 78 GLGC 0.071 184.7 4.4% 0.0001 0.050
ARIC 0.087 10.7 0.2391 (<0.001) 100% 0.0223 0.052
HDL cholesterol 85 GLGC 0.050 116.7 4.4% <0.0001 0.050
ARIC 0.057 6.2 -0.1224 (0.13) 100% -0.0197 0.051
Triglycerides 53 GLGC 0.044 163.7 4.4% <0.0001 0.050
ARIC 0.064 11.2 0.0618 (0.48) 100% 0.0055 0.050
TC 85 GLGC 0.066 156.7 4.4% 0.0001 0.050
ARIC 0.089 10.0 0.2372 (<0.001) 100% 0.0237 0.052

LDL cholesterol: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC: total cholesterol

*Percentage of variance in the lipids explained by the SNPs

The F statistic, bias under the null, and the type I error rate values were estimated using equations from Burgess et al.[28]

In ARIC, the log-odds ratio for AAA per 1 standard deviation (SD) increment in the lipid fraction using traditional logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, study center, smoking status, height, white blood count, fibrinogen, hypertension, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, and the other lipid fractions (for LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides models only)

SDs from GLGC (LDL cholesterol: 38.7 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol: 15.5 mg/dL; triglycerides: 90.7 mg/dL; total cholesterol: 41.8 mg/dL)