Table 4.
Study | Study design (N) | Pleural perfusion (N) | Efficacy of therapy | Improvement of SI (N,%) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | ||||||||||||
Group 1 | Group 2 | CR | PR | SD | PD | CR | PR | SD | PD | Group 1 | Group 2 | ||||
Guo Y 2004 [13] | 30 | 30 | BJOE + P | P | 11 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 14 | 0 | – | – | |
Lei H 2006 [14] | 31 | 30 | BJOE + P | P | 11 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 24(77.4) | 12(40) | |
Wang H 2007 [15] | 35 | 35 | BJOE + P | P | 13 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 15 | 0 | 32(91.4) | 20(57.1) | |
Wu S 2009 [16] | 68 | 55 | BJOE + P | P | 39 | 20 | 9 | 0 | 16 | 28 | 11 | 0 | – | – | |
Fu X 2009 [17] | 60 | 60 | BJOE + P | P | 22 | 28 | 8 | 2 | 14 | 21 | 18 | 7 | 44(73.3) | 33(55) | |
Chen Y 2011 [18] | 31 | 30 | BJOE + P | P | 12 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 13 | 0 | – | – | |
Jia L 2011 [19] | 35 | 35 | BJOE+ L-OHP | L-OHP | 10 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 15 | 12 | 0 | – | – | |
Liu B 2012 [20] | 32 | 32 | BJOE + P | P | 18 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 28(75) | 24(50) | |
Zhang J 2012 [21] | 28 | 36 | BJOE + BLM | BLM | 10 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 25(89.3) | 21(58.3) | |
Zhang H 2013 [22] | 34 | 30 | BJOE + P | P | 19 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 13 | 0 | – | – | |
Yang G 2014 [23] | 48 | 46 | BJOE + P | P | 14 | 26 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 16 | 4 | 42(87.5) | 24(52.17) | |
Yang H 2014 [24] | 32 | 32 | BJOE + P | P | 18 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 6 | – | – | |
Yue K 2016 [25] | 60 | 50 | BJOE + P | P | 23 | 27 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 23 | 0 | 43(71.7) | 18(36) | |
Wang C 2016 [26] | 30 | 30 | BJOE + P | P | 10 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 24(80) | 16(53.3) |
N cases; Group 1 BJOE combined with chemotherapeutic agents; Group 2 Chemotherapeutic agents alone, BJOE Brucea javanica oil emulsion; P cisplatin, L-OHP Oxaliplatin, BLM bleomycin, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease