Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 12;8(4):e020589. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020589

Table 2.

Likelihood of having BP measured multiple times or being asked to monitor BP at home, according to patient and practitioner characteristics (stratified by diabetes status)

Likelihood of multiple BP measurements
(n (%) in each group)
(difference (95% CI))
Likelihood of being asked to monitor BP at home
(n (%) in each group)
(difference (95% CI))
In participants with diabetes
 If the participant was hypertensive versus normotensive 46/103 (44.7%) vs 28/80 (35.0%), difference=9.7% (−4.5% to 23.9%) 24/159 (15.1%) vs 13/120 (10.8%), difference=4.3% (−3.6% to 12.1%)
 If the participant had treated hypertension versus untreated hypertension 40/93 (43.0%) vs 6/10 (60.0%), difference=−17.0% (−49.0% to 15.0%) 22/141 (15.6%) vs 2/18 (11.1%), difference=4.5% (−11.2% to 20.2%)
 If BP was measured by a GP versus a nurse 16/38 (42.1%) vs 56/139 (40.3%), difference=1.8% (−15.9% to 19.5%) 11/38 (28.9%) vs 15/139 (10.8%), difference=18.2% (2.8% to 33.5%)
In participants without diabetes
 If the participant was hypertensive versus normotensive 2/6 (33.3%) vs 9/28 (32.1%), difference=1.2% (−40.3% to 42.7%) 14/41 (34.1%) vs 0/14 (0.0%), difference=34.1% (19.6% to 48.7%)
 If the participant had treated hypertension versus untreated hypertension 8/23 (34.8%) vs 1/5 (20.0%), difference=14.8% (−25.3% to 54.9%) 9/32 (28.1%) vs 5/9 (55.6%), difference=−27.4% (−63.4% to 8.6%)
 If BP was measured by a GP versus a nurse 9/21 (42.9%) vs 2/11 (18.2%), difference=24.7% (−6.4% to 55.8%) 7/21 (33.3%) vs 4/11 (36.4%), difference=−3.0% (−37.9% to 31.8%)

BP, blood pressure; GP, general practitioner.