Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 10;10:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.01.002

Table 1c.

Studies investigating the incorporation of choice behaviour on statistical efficiency

Author, Year Outcome of interest Method to create design Design setting Sample size Choice sets Altern-atives Attri-
butes
Attribute levels Results
Crabbe, 2012 [33] Local D-error
  • 1)

    Individually adapted sequential Bayesian designs (IASB) with covariates incorporated

  • 2)

    IASB designs, no covariates

  • 3)

    single nearly orthogonal designs, no covariates

  • 1)

    Choice behaviour is influenced by 2 covariates

  • 2)

    Choice behaviour is NOT influenced by 2 (irrelevant) covariates

25, 250 16 3 3 3
  • Across all design settings and sample sizes:

  • 1)

    Despite IASB designs incorporating two irrelevant covariates of participant behaviour, they still more statistically efficient than designs that do not incorporate any covariates.

  • 2)

    IASB designs with two relevant covariates perform better (in terms of D-efficiency) in comparison to IASB designs with to irrelevant covariates, holding everything else constant.

Donkers, 2003 [37] Average percentage change in D-error Design incorporates the proportion of the population selecting y = 1, which varies from 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 50% of the population. Results of D-error compared to random sampling from population. . Sample selection is dependent on proportion that selects Y = 1 2 2 1 binary, 1 continuous
(Distribution of binary attribute when X = 1:
50% or 10% of the time)
  • 1)

    As the proportion of the population selecting Y = 1 increases from 2.5% to 50%, D-efficiency improves.

  • 2)

    As more individuals select 1, the magnitude of the reduction in D-error decreases (in comparison to when a random sample is used). The highest reduction in D-error (or improvement in D-efficiency) is when only 2.5% of the population selects y = 1.

  • 3)

    Above results are consistent when binary attribute (x = 1) is distributed 10% or 50% of the time within the DCE.

Donkers, 2003 [37] Average percentage change in D-error Design incorporates the proportion of the population selecting y = 1, which varies from 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 50% of the population. Results of D-error compared to random sampling from population. . Sample selection is dependent on:
  • a)

    y only

  • b)

    y and x

  • c)

    x only

2 2 1 binary, 1 continuous;
binary attribute is unevenly distributed with x = 1 only 10% of the time
Type of sample selection (y only, y and x, x only)
  • 1)

    Designs with sample selection on both y and x yields higher statistical efficiency than designs with sample selection on y only or x only, where y is the outcome, and x is an attribute.