Table 1c.
Author, Year | Outcome of interest | Method to create design | Design setting | Sample size | Choice sets | Altern-atives | Attri- butes |
Attribute levels | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crabbe, 2012 [33] | Local D-error |
|
|
25, 250 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
|
Donkers, 2003 [37] | Average percentage change in D-error | Design incorporates the proportion of the population selecting y = 1, which varies from 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 50% of the population. Results of D-error compared to random sampling from population. | . | Sample selection is dependent on proportion that selects Y = 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 binary, 1 continuous (Distribution of binary attribute when X = 1: 50% or 10% of the time) |
|
|
Donkers, 2003 [37] | Average percentage change in D-error | Design incorporates the proportion of the population selecting y = 1, which varies from 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 50% of the population. Results of D-error compared to random sampling from population. | . | Sample selection is dependent on:
|
2 | 2 | 1 binary, 1 continuous; binary attribute is unevenly distributed with x = 1 only 10% of the time |
Type of sample selection (y only, y and x, x only)
|