Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar;110(3):219–228. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180042

Table 5.

Strain values between two groups.

  Control Chemotherapy p value
GLS (%) -21.86 ± 2.38 -20.36 ± 2.58 0.016*
GCS (%) -27.73 ± 3.37 -24.94 ± 4.14 0.004*
GRS (%) 31.44 ± 12.98 26.89 ± 9.75 0.118
LS-ENDO(%) -25.21 ± 2.72 -23.38 ± 3.11 0.014*
LS-MID(%) -21.53 ± 2.36 -20.35 ± 2.58 0.029*
LS-EPI(%) -18.83 ± 2.19 -17.35 ± 2.48 0.013*
LS gradient (%) -6.38 ± 1.28 -6.03 ± 2.07 0.439
CS-ENDO(%) -37.37 ± 3.79 -32.88 ± 5.23 0.000*
CS-MID(%) -26.24 ± 2.98 -24.62 ± 4.13 0.073
CS-EPI(%) -19.56 ± 4.45 -17.32 ± 4.13 0.066
CS gradient(%) -17.80 ± 3.69 -15.55 ± 4.59 0.0*

CS-ENDO: subendocardial circumferential strain; CS-EPI: subepicardial circumferential strain; CS-MID: middle circumferential strain; GCS: global circumferential strain; GLS: global longitudinal strain; GRS: global radial strain; LS-ENDO: subendocardial longitudinal strain; LS-EPI: subepicardial longitudinal strain; LS-MID: middle longitudinal strain.

*

p < 0.05. p values were assessed by independent samples t test