Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;14(4):e1006055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006055

Fig 5. The effect of the average ribosomal pool.

Fig 5

(a) Block diagram of the current test. (b) Normalized za as a function of L˜h of GFP_HIGH_RD, for α = 0.8, A = 1/2, T = 16, and different values of z. (c) Legend of the sub-figures. The right-to-left order corresponds to the performance ranking, per L˜h value, in sub-figures (b), (d), and (e), i.e. z=10% results in the largest measurement values, followed by z=15%, etc. (d) Normalized Ra (upper figure) and normalized ρa (lower figure) as a function of L˜h of GFP_HIGH_RD, for α = 0.8, A = 1/2, T = 16, and different values of z. (e) Normalized R^a (upper figure) and normalized ρ^a (lower figure) as a function of L˜h of GFP_HIGH_RD, for α = 0.8, A = 1/2, T = 16, and different values of z.