TABLE 4.
Drug | Drug-resistant phenotype | Hi confidence iBCVs | Hi+Mo confidence iBCVs | Hi+Mo+Mi confidence iBCVs | ||||||
False-susceptible | Resistance missed % (95% CI) | Difference in sensitivity % | False-susceptible | Resistance missed % (95% CI) | Difference in sensitivity % | False-susceptible | Resistance missed % (95% CI) | Difference in sensitivity % | ||
Rifampicin (R) | 8294 | 55 | 0.7 (0.5–0.9) | 0.1 | 124 | 1.5 (1.2–1.8) | 0.2 | 192 | 2.3 (2.0–2.6) | 0.2 |
Isoniazid (H) | 11001 | 55 | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | 0.2 | 81 | 0.7 (0.6–0.9) | 0.2 | 81 | 0.7 (0.6–0.9) | 0.2 |
Moxifloxacin (MFX) | 517 | 50 | 8.8 (6.6–11.5) | 1.0 | 50 | 8.8 (6.6–11.5) | 1.0 | 50 | 8.8 (6.6–11.5) | 1.0 |
Ofloxacin (OFX) /levofloxacin (LFX) |
3809 | 93 | 2.4 (1.9–2.9) | 0.5 | 94 | 2.4 (2.0–2.9) | 0.5 | 94 | 2.4 (2.0–3.0) | 0.5 |
Amikacin (AM) | 809 | 6 | 0.7 (0.3–1.6) | 0.2 | 6 | 0.7 (0.3–1.6) | 0.2 | 6 | 0.7 (0.3–1.6) | 0.2 |
Kanamycin (KM) | 943 | 25 | 2.6 (1.7–3.8) | 0.8 | 25 | 2.6 (1.7–3.8) | 0.8 | 25 | 2.6 (1.7–3.8) | 0.8 |
Capreomycin (CM) | 810 | 109 | 11.9 (9.8–14.1) | 3.9 | 109 | 11.9 (9.8–14.1) | 3.9 | 109 | 11.9 (9.8–14.1) | 3.9 |
Streptomycin (S) | 2204 | 16 | 0.7 (0.4–1.2) | 0.3 | 16 | 0.7 (0.4–1.2) | 0.3 | 16 | 0.7 (0.4–1.2) | 0.3 |
Ethionamide and prothionamide (ETO/PTO) | 298 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–1.2) | 0.0 | 7 | 2.3 (0.9–4.7) | 1.2 | 7 | 2.3 (0.9–4.7) | 1.2 |
Pyrazinamide (Z) | 2595 | 59 | 2.2 (1.7–2.9) | 0.8 | 67 | 2.5 (2.0–3.2) | 0.9 | 83 | 3.1 (2.5–3.8) | 1.0 |
The resistance missed corresponds to the false-susceptible isolates divided by the “corrected phenotype”, consisting of the sum of phenotypically resistant isolates and false-susceptible isolates (the probable smallest and largest figures in each category are shown in bold). The difference in sensitivity was calculated by subtracting the sensitivity for the “observed phenotype” from the sensitivity of the “corrected phenotype” (both sensitivities are plotted in figure 2a).