TABLE 4.
Reference standard | Test | Direct or indirect | Smear status | Datasets (samples) n | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) |
Culture reference | MTB | Direct | All | 6 (3451) | 85.0% (70.0–93.3) | 98.0% (96.2–99.0) |
MTB | Direct | Positive | 5 (802)¶ | 94.4% (89.4–99.4) | # | |
MTB | Direct | Negative | 5 (961) | 44.4% (29.2–71.7) | 98.9% (95.4–99.7) | |
Culture reference | MTB | Direct: fresh | Both | 4 | 83.0% (61.9–93.6) | 98.8% (97.2–99.5) |
Culture reference | MTB | Direct: frozen | Both | 2+ | # | # |
+: meta-analysis was not possible based on the number of datasets identified for this subset. #: not estimable. ¶: two of these five studies only reported on sensitivity so bivariate meta-analysis for specificity was not possible. Of the three studies that contributed data on smear positive specificity, estimates were 50% (n.b. only had 2 specimens that were MTB negative), 100% and 100%.