Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Dec 21;53(4):383–391. doi: 10.1038/s41409-017-0029-9

Table 4.

Multivariate association between donor RTL and HCT outcome in the combined cohorts comparing long to short RTL (using the 25th percentile as a cut-off point).

Outcome N event/N total HR* 95% CI p-value
OS 564/1077 0.99 0.81-1.20 0.91
DFS 577/1072 0.99 0.82-1.21 0.95
TRM 265/1072 1.01 0.76-1.34 0.95
Relapse 312/1072 0.99 0.76-1.29 0.59
aGVHD II-IV 472/1067 0.89 0.72-1.11 0.30
aGVHD III-IV 168/1080 1.06 0.74-1.52 0.75
cGVHD 582/1032 0.97 0.79-1.18 0.75
Neutrophil engraftment 1040/1065 1.13 0.97-1.31 0.11
*

Hazard ratio; models are adjusted for the following covariates:

OS: cytogenetics, donor age, recipient age, use of TBI; stratified by graft type

DFS: cytogenetics, donor age, recipient age, disease status, interval from diagnosis to transplant; stratified by graft type

TRM: cytogenetics, donor age, recipient age, graft type and use of TBI; stratified by graft type

Relapse: cytogenetics, disease status, interval from diagnosis to transplant, donor age

aGVHD II-IV: ATG, use of alemtuzumab, recipient-donor sex match; stratified by permissive mismatches and year of transplant, donor age

aGVHD III-IV: ATG, graft type and recipient-donor sex match; stratified by TCE match, donor age

cGVHD: ATG, use of alemtuzumab, conditioning regimen, graft type and year of transplant, donor age

Neutrophil engraftment: ABO match, donor age, GvHD prophylaxis; stratified on graft type, and conditioning regimen