Table 4.
Determinants of catastrophic health expenditure from 2008 to 2015 using a logistic random effects regression model
Variable | Year/ adjusted OR (95% CI) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
Expenditure quintiles Q1(poorest) Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5(richest) |
Referent 0.57 (0.48–0.67)a 0.46 (0.38–0.57)a 0.41 (0.31–0.56)a 0.31 (0.18–0.51)a |
Referent 0.71 (0.59–0.85a 0.52 (0.39–0.68)a 0.40 (0.30–0.54)a 0.32 (0.19–0.54)a |
Referent 0.54 (0.46–0.62)a 0.42 (0.35–0.51)a 0.36 (0.28–0.46)a 0.40 (0.28–0.58)a |
Referent 0.71 (0.56–0.90)a 0.45 (0.33 0.61)a 0.32 (0.23–0.46)a 0.32 (0.22–0.48)a |
Referent 0.77 (0.61–0.96)a 0.47 (0.36–0.63)a 0.38 (0.29–0.50)a 0.32 (0.22–0.47)a |
Referent 0.73 (0.60–0.89)a 0.50 (0.38–0.65)a 0.43 (0.33–0.57)a 0.36 (0.26–0.49)a |
Referent 0.73 (0.59–0.90)a 0.52 (0.40–0.67)a 0.31 (0.25–0.39)a 0.23 (0.17–0.32)a |
Referent 0.72 (0.58–0.87)a 0.52 (0.39–0.64)a 0.47 (0.36–0.57)a 0.49 (0.33–0.63)a |
Household settlement Urban Rural |
Referent 1.36 (1.11–1.65)a |
Referent 1.19 (1.03–1.37)a |
Referent 1.06 (0.95–1.18) |
Referent 5.63 (3.94–8.05)a |
Referent 1.34 (1.13–1.59)a |
Referent 1.36 (1.19–1.55)a |
Referent 1.32 (1.16–1.50)a |
Referent 1.35 (1.15–1.51)a |
Household head gender Male Female |
Referent 1.02 (0.79–1.21) |
Referent 1.36 (1.14–1.62)a |
Referent 1.17 (1.01–1.35)a |
Referent 1.02 (0.83–1.26) |
Referent 1.12 (0.94–1.33) |
Referent 1.07 (0.93–1.23) |
Referent 1.03 (0.84–1.27) |
Referent 1.01 (0.79–1.20) |
Hospitalized person in Household No Yes |
Referent 1.72 (1.62–1.83)a |
Referent 3.15 (2.65–3.75)a |
Referent 2.80 (2.28–3.46)a |
Referent 1.71 (1.54–1.90)a |
Referent 1.48 (1.29–1.69)a |
Referent 0.96 (0.73–1.26) |
Referent 1.33 (1.24–1.43)a |
Referent 1.75 (1.41–2.03)a |
Household using outpatient care No Yes |
Referent 1.69 (1.47–1.85)a |
Referent 3.53 (2.71–4.59)a |
Referent 5.66 (4.62–6.94)a |
Referent 7.27 (4.52–11.68)a |
Referent 10.05 (7.08–14.29)a |
Referent 5.76 (4.50–7.38)a |
Referent 3.04 (2.32–3.98)a |
Referent 5.25 (4.15–6.91)a |
+ 60 member living in Household No Yes |
Referent 1.88 (1.56–2.26)a |
Referent 1.68 (1.40–2.02)a |
Referent 1.63 (1.35–1.97)a |
Referent 2.18 (1.76–2.71)a |
Referent 1.83 (1.46–2.29)a |
Referent 1.91 (1.59–2.28)a |
Referent 1.01 (0.89–1.15) |
Referent 2.09 (1.72–2.39)a |
Statistics | Wald-chi2: 709.8 Pseudo R2 = 0.16 |
Wald-chi2: 550.9 Pseudo R2 = 0.17 |
Wald-chi2: 537.6 Pseudo R2 = 0.17 |
Wald-chi2: 485.8 Pseudo R2 = 0.07 |
Wald-chi2: 377.4 Pseudo R2 = 0.12 |
Wald-chi2: 483.9 Pseudo R2 = 0.09 |
Wald-chi2: 743.4 Pseudo R2 = 0.11 |
Wald-chi2: 657.6 Pseudo R2 = 0.13 |
aThe odds ratios that became significant after adjustment for cluster (Province) effect