Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Jan 2;62(1):36–44. doi: 10.1037/rep0000117

Table 3.

The Multivariate Mixed Effect Regression Modela for the Association of the Measurement of Environmental Barriers With Social Participation (n = 3,130)

Social participations
Environmental barriers
CHART-t
Employment status
Analysis Coef. (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
1. CHIEF-t score −.831*[−1.08, −.58] .96* [.95, .98]
  CHIEF-SF average item score
2. Non-work/school related dimension −8.32* [−10.76, −5.87] .70* [.61, .79]
3. Physical/structure −2.86* [−4.38, −1.37] .84* [.78, .90]
4. Assistance/services −8.18* [−10.11, −6.24] .76* [.68, .84]
5. Work/school (n = 967) −2.34 [−5.65, .97] 1.17 [.96, 1.42]
6. Attitude/support −3.25* [−5.29, −1.20] .89* [.81, .98]
7. Policies −1.52 [−3.20, .159] .91* [.84, .98]

Note. All analysis adjusted for age, years since injury, ex, MNLI, AIS, current educational level, bladder management, and pain level. All the results from the mixed linear model taking into consideration the correlated nature of the outcome variable within the same region were significantly different from the results of the regular linear model. CHIEF-t = CHIEF-SF total score without the contribution of work/school dimension; CHART-t = CHART-SF total score from dimensions of physical independence, mobility, occupation, and social integration. Employment status: Employed or others. CHIEF = Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors—Short Form; CHART = Craig Handicap Assessment and Report Technique—Short Form; Coef. = regression coefficient; CI = confidence interval.

a

The mixed linear regression model was used in the analysis for CHART-t, and the mixed logistic regression model was used in analysis for employment status.

*

p < .05.