Table IV.
Hypotheses concerning the regulation of IHATS expression and supporting observations
| Hypothesis | Observation |
|---|---|
| NO3− is not responsible for down-regulating HvNRT2 transcript levels. | Tungstate treatment increased HvNRT2 transcript abundance (Figs. 3B and 4). |
| NO3− may act post-transcriptionally. | Tungstate treatment decreased NO3− influx (Fig. 3A). |
| Elevated concentrations of NH4+ down-regulate HvNRT2 transcript levels. | MSO decreased HvNRT2 transcript levels, when applied together with NH4+ (Table III). |
| NH4+ exerts post-transcriptional effects. | MSO was capable of reducing NO3− influx substantially without significantly affecting HvNRT2 transcript levels (Figs. 3, A and B, and 4). |
| Gln is the main down-regulator of HvNRT2 transcript levels. | NH4+ treatment dramatically decreased HvNRT2 transcript level when its conversion to Gln was not blocked by MSO (Table III). |
| Addition of all amino acids increased root Gln levels, and decreased HvNRT2 transcript levels (Table I; Fig. 2B). | |
| When root Glu and Gln concentrations were increased by exogenous application, HvNRT2 transcript levels were inversely correlated with Glu and Gln concentrations. | |
| Tungstate treatment reduced root Gln by 81%, without affecting root Glu. This treatment produced a 20%–30% increase of HvNRT2 mRNA. | |
| Treatments with AZA decreased root [Glu] by 90%, increased root [Gln] by 43%, and decreased HvNRT2 transcript levels and 13NO3− by 97% and 95%, respectively (Table II; Fig. 3). |