Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 16;124(7):1358–1373. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31125

Table 1.

Clinical and Genomic Characteristics of ERBB2‐ and ERBB3‐mutated mCRC

All mCRC ERBB2 Positive ERBB2 Positive ERBB3 Positive Cooccurring ERBB2/3
Amplification Short Variants Amp + SV
No. of cases
Total 8887 251 (2.8%) 135 (1.5%) 35 (0.4%) 140 (1.6%) 8 (0.1%)
Colonic CRC 7599 215 (2.8%) 112 (1.5%) 28 (0.4%) 113 (1.5%) 7 (0.1%)
Rectal CRC 1288 36 (2.8%) 23 (1.8%) 7 (0.5%) 27 (2.1%) 1 (<0.1%)
Sample site
Colorectal 4660 124 79 21 64 4
Distant 4176 124 55 14 74 4
Stage
IV 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Patient demographics
Median age (range), y 56 (8‐96) 54 (22‐88) 59 (31‐79) 57 (29‐87) 54 (14‐83) 53 (46‐80)
Sex
Female 45% 43% 41% 46% 39% 50%
Male 55% 57% 59% 54% 60% 50%
ERBB mutation type
Amplification NA 251 2 0
Short variant NA 135 138 8
Amp + SV NA 35 0 0
Global mutation metrics
TMB (mut/Mb)
Range 0‐854.1 0‐230.6 0‐230.6 0‐10.1 0‐854.1 6.3‐126.1
Median 3.8 3.6 5.4 3.8 5.4 44.2
<6 mut/Mb 6294 (70.8%) 179 (71.3%) 68 (50.4%) 27 (77.1%) 79 (56.4%) 0 (0.0%)
6‐20 mut/Mb 2173 (24.5%) 72 (28.7%) 38 (28.1%) 8 (22.9%) 36 (25.7%) 2 (25.0%)
≥20 mut/Mb 420 (4.7%) 0 (0%) 29 (21.5%) 0 (0%) 25 (17.9%) 6 (75.0%)
P <<.0005 <.0001 NS <<.0001 <<.0001
MSI
No. of cases evaluated 5899 171 77 24 83 5
Stable 5389 (91.4%) 169 (98.8%) 64 (83.1%) 24 (100%) 69 (83.1%) 1 (20%)
Ambiguous 103 (1.7%) 2 (1.2%) 1 (1.3%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.2%) 1 (20%)
High 407 (6.9%) 0 (0%) 12 (15.6%) 0 (0%) 12 (14.5%) 3 (60%)
P <.005 <.005 NS <.05 <<.0001

Abbreviations: Amp, amplification; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; MSI, microsatellite instability; NA, not applicable, NS, not significant; mut/Mb, mutations per megabase; TMB, tumor mutational burden; SV, short variant.

Samples in the cooccurring column had both ERBB2 and ERBB3 alterations, whereas other samples had only ERBB2 or ERBB3 alterations. Sample site was defined as colorectal for the colon or rectum and distant for all others; a subset of samples did not have the exact sample site defined. Significance values for TMB and MSI were calculated by the chi‐square test and compared the distribution of samples positive for a given alteration type with the distribution for all other samples in the data set.