Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 31;37(9):1550–1561. doi: 10.1002/sim.7609

Table 2.

– Simulation results for modified SIDES and IPD‐SIDES when there is small (τ2 = 0.1) and large (τ2 = 0.9) between‐study variation and N = 1000. Results display % of correctly identified final trees

T × X 2 Standardized Interaction Effect Size (τ2 = 0.1) T × X 2 Standardized Interaction Effect Size (τ2 = 0.9)
T × X 1 Standardized Interaction Effect Size None = 0 Small = 0.2 Medium = 0.5 Large = 0.8 None = 0 Small = 0.2 Medium = 0.5 Large = 0.8
None = 0 Modified SIDES 91.7 16.0 78.6 88.00 97.0 6.7 66.7 96.9
IPD‐SIDES 91.0 15.5 76.5 92.1 90.3 17.9 78.9 93.1
Small = 0.2 Modified SIDES 16.3 5.7 26.8 18.9 8.3 1.8 9.8 8.7
IPD‐SIDES 19.1 7.0 32.8 22.3 14.4 14.4 20.9 21.8
Medium = 0.5 Modified SIDES 77.6 23.9 74.3 82.2 70.1 9.0 51.2 67.0
IPD‐SIDES 65.9 23.4 74.6 89.8 77.1 23.0 84.8 91.6
Large = 0.8 Modified SIDES 94.1 30.4 90.1 100 97.5 16.1 76.9 97.1
IPD‐SIDES 92.4 22.5 92.8 100 92.1 22.1 81.6 100