Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 31;37(9):1550–1561. doi: 10.1002/sim.7609

Table 3.

– Simulation results for modified SIDES and IPD‐SIDES when there is small (τ2 = 0.1) and large (τ2 = 0.9) between‐study variation and N = 2500. Results display % of correctly identified final trees

T × X 2 Standardized Interaction Effect Size (τ2 = 0.1) T ×X 2 Standardized Interaction Effect Size (τ2 = 0.9)
T × X 1 Standardized Interaction Effect Size None = 0 Small = 0.2 Medium = 0.5 Large = 0.8 None = 0 Small = 0.2 Medium = 0.5 Large = 0.8
None = 0 Modified SIDES 92.5 39.4 90.3 94.0 97.3 23.7 95.4 97.4
IPD‐SIDES 91.2 38.5 91.7 93.5 90.9 37.7 91.0 92.5
Small = 0.2 Modified SIDES 36.4 21.7 42.5 42.8 23.0 10.0 25.3 23.6
IPD‐SIDES 38.3 31.3 45.8 43.3 38.1 25.1 44.5 41.6
Medium = 0.5 Modified SIDES 92.6 47.8 99.6 99.1 93.8 23.1 97.3 99.3
IPD‐SIDES 91.7 43.3 99.9 99.7 93.0 44.1 92.5 99.5
Large = 0.8 Modified SIDES 93.9 41.4 99.9 100 98.1 24.0 98.5 100
IPD‐SIDES 93.7 43.4 99.8 100 92.7 44.5 99.9 100