Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 31;37(9):1550–1561. doi: 10.1002/sim.7609

Table 4.

– Simulation results for modified SIDES and IPD‐SIDES when there is small (τ2 = 0.1) and large (τ2 = 0.9) between‐study variation and N = 5000. Results display % of correctly identified final trees

T × X 2 Standardized Interaction Effect Size (τ2 = 0.1) T × X 2 Standardized Interaction Effect Size (τ2 = 0.9)
T × X 1 Standardized Interaction Effect Size None = 0 Small = 0.2 Medium = 0.5 Large = 0.8 None = 0 Small = 0.2 Medium = 0.5 Large = 0.8
None = 0 Modified SIDES 93.0 60.8 94.3 88.5 97.6 56.4 98.3 97.1
IPD‐SIDES 91.4 62.0 93.2 83.6 90.5 70.2 93.0 83.9
Small = 0.2 Modified SIDES 69.7 71.3 74.3 76.0 53.9 40.4 64.1 56.3
IPD‐SIDES 69.9 63.5 75.1 79.1 61.1 63.4 78.6 81.7
Medium = 0.5 Modified SIDES 93.8 74.5 100 100 98.1 54.4 100 100
IPD‐SIDES 91.5 76.0 100 100 93.5 77.3 99.7 100
Large = 0.8 Modified SIDES 88.9 76.9 100 100 97.4 60.2 100 100
IPD‐SIDES 85.5 81.9 100 100 83.9 80.2 100 100