Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;9:446. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00446

Table 2.

Summary of polymorphism and molecular diversity among 330genotypes that belongs to different categorical groups (types of rice, ecology, groups predicted based on the model-based STRUCTURE at K = 2 and K = 3, and cluster analysis).

Category Description Number of genotypes Polymorphism with MAF ≥ 0.01 (%) Average observed heterozygosity (Std) Average expected heterozygosity (Std)∗∗ Average nucleotide diversity (Std)
Type of rice Indica 172 87.9% 0.014 (0.064) 0.170 (0.143) 0.164 (0.078)
Japonica 62 78.6% 0.015 (0.073) 0.224 (0.124) 0.186 (0.088)
NERICA 85 90.6% 0.015 (0.065) 0.286 (0.144) 0.260 (0.123)
ARICA 11 68.4% 0.023 (0.085) 0.255 (0.125) 0.174 (0.086)
Ecology Irrigated lowland 88 88.3% 0.017 (0.067) 0.170 (0.144) 0.154 (0.073)
Rainfed lowland 160 87.7% 0.013 (0.064) 0.147 (0.147) 0.144 (0.068)
Upland 81 86.6% 0.014 (0.072) 0.175 (0.123) 0.154 (0.073)
Lowland (Irrigated and rainfed) 248 92.0% 0.014 (0.064) 0.153 (0.143) 0.151 (0.071)
Groups based on ecology and type
Lowland Indica 183 89.1% 0.015 (0.065) 0.163 (0.145) 0.157 (0.074)
Lowland NERICA 65 62.8% 0.020 (0.081) 0.149 (0.144) 0.105 (0.050)
Upland NERICA 19 37.0% 0.031 (0.118) 0.263 (0.154) 0.097 (0.047)
Upland Japonica 63 80.1% 0.015 (0.074) 0.202 (0.121) 0.165 (0.078)
Groups based on structure at K = 2 and cluster analysis
Group 1 82 73.0% 0.017 (0.079) 0.134 (0.136) 0.104 (0.049)
Group 2 248 80.8% 0.015 (0.065) 0.143 (0.150) 0.135 (0.064)
Groups based on STRUCTURE at K = 3
Group 1 82 73.0% 0.017 (0.082) 0.138 (0.139) 0.098 (0.047)
Group 2 181 72.7% 0.016 (0.068) 0.156 (0.152) 0.138 (0.065)
Group 3 67 52.3% 0.021 (0.085) 0.120 (0.132) 0.079 (0.038)

Std, standard deviation; ∗∗expected heterozygosity, gene diversity.