Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 6;38(3):184–189. doi: 10.1002/pd.5212

Table 4.

Breakdown of abnormal microarray data by group

CMA Group (N = 257) CMA/Karyotype Group (N = 156)
Detectable by karyotype 177 112
Aneuploidy 124 89
Non‐mosaic 115 79
Mosaic 6 9
Aneuploidy + deletion 2 0
Aneuploidy + ROH 1 1
Deletion and duplication 15a 7
>1 copy number variant 2 1
Deletions 16 6
Duplications 12 6
Mosaic duplication 2 1 b
Mosaic triplication 0 1b
Triploidy 8 1
Complex structural abnormality 0 1
Possibly/partially detectable by karyotype 10 1
Deletion and duplication 6c 1 (mosaic)
Duplication 1 0
Two duplications 1 0
Duplication + triplication 1 0
Mosaic deletion + mosaic aneuploidy 1 0
Not detectable by karyotype 70 43
Microdeletions 49 20
Syndromic 29 12
Non‐syndromic 20 8
Microduplications 9 13
Syndromic 3 2
Non‐syndromic 6 11
Mosaic aneuploidy + mosaic microdeletion 0 1e
Microdeletion and microduplication 8 6
Microdeletion and triplication 1 0
>1 copy number variant 2d 1
Single ROH 1 0
UPD 1 1
Complex structural abnormality 0 1
a

All had karyotype/FISH that detected a structural abnormality.

b

Karyotype performed.

c

5/6 had karyotype performed that partially detected the abnormality and required array to clarify (ie, marker chromosomes, unknown bands involved); 1/6 was mosaic.

d

One is mosaic.

e

Normal karyotype.