Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 2;57(4):561–568. doi: 10.1002/mus.26052

Table 2.

Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints: change in the final 3TUG times and W‐SAS score upon withdrawal of study drug

Study group Score Taper‐to‐placebo, n = 18, n (%) Continuous 3,4‐DAP, n = 14, n (%)
3TUG change No change or faster 5 (27.8) 14 (100)
>30% Slower 13 (72.2) 0 (0)
P < 0.0001a
Final W‐SAS Much much weaker (−3) 10 (55.6) 1 (7.1)
Much weaker (−2) 6 (33.3) 1 (7.1)
Somewhat weaker (−1) 1 (5.6) 1 (7.1)
About the same (0) 1 (5.6) 9 (64.3)
Somewhat stronger (+1) 0 (0.0) 1 (7.1)
Much stronger (+2) 0 (0.0) 1 (7.1)
Much much stronger (+3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
P < 0.0001b

3,4‐DAP, 3,4‐diaminopyridine base; 3TUG, triple timed up‐and‐go; CMH, Cochrane‐Mantel‐Haenszel; W‐SAS, LEM‐related weakness self‐assessment scale.

a

Fisher's exact test.

b

CMH test for categorical data.