Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 10;41(2):174–181. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1279817

Table 2.

Subject responses to GNS.

Subject Sensation threshold (mA) Pudendal-anal threshold (mA) Tolerance limit (mA) GNS amplitude (mA) Bladder contraction inhibited? Baseline bladder volume (mL) Bladder capacity increase (mL)
1 9 8 15 15 Y 249 0
2 6 10 30 20 Y 282 0
3 3 6 8 7 Y 222 127
4 8 8 35 16 NA 148 NA
5 2 NA >60 30 N 479 113
6 3 6 12 12 Y 445 0
7 5 9 15 15 Y 201 110
8 6 NA 40 30 Y 455 320
9 8 17 60 50 Y 572 109
10 6 NA 20 20 N 295 55
11 7 NA 22 20 Y 409 84
12 14 14 22 22 Y 343 187
13 2 17 >60 40 Y 90 203
14 15 NA 30 30 Y 47 0
15 3 8 9 8 Y 245 170
16 4 8 30 28 Y 560 65
17 9 14 36 28 Y 122 162
18 2 4 9 8 N 180 130
19 20 4 40 30 Y 485 283
20 4 10 14 14 N 297 91
21 6 4 45 30 Y 181 408
22 5 6 35 30 Y 165 302
23 5 20 25 25 Y 389 72
24 3 7 30 30 Y 353 117
Summary 6±4 8±5 30±16 25±11 19/23 301±149 135±109

No pudendal-anal reflex was observed in subjects 5, 8, 10, 11, or 14. Subject 4 demonstrated symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia, due to filling the bladder during urodynamics, before collecting data on effectiveness of GNS. In subject 4 GNS was applied with the bladder empty and no AD occurred at 35 mA, and therefore sensation and tolerance data were collected.