Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 24;89(2):204–210. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1406243

Table 4.

Results (hazard ratios – HR) from the Cox regression models with revision as endpoint

Fixation point and group HR (CI) Adjusted HR (CI) a
Femoral fixation
 Cortical fixation
  Endobutton Ref. Ref.
  Other 0.9 (0.8–1.2) 0.8 (0.7–1.1)
 Transfemoral fixation
  Rigidfix 0.7 (0.6–0.8) 0.7 (0.6–0.8)
  Transfix 0.7 (0.5–0.8) 0.7 (0.6–0.9)
  Other 1.2 (0.9–1.8) 1.1 (0.7–1.6)
 Interference screw 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 1.1 (0.9–1.4)
 Other/unknown 1.1 (0.7–1.7) 1.1 (0.7–1.9)
Tibial fixation
 Cortical fixation 1.1 (1.0–1.4) 1.1 (0.9–1.4)
 Interference screw Ref. Ref.
 Intrafix 0.9 (0.8–1.1) 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
 Retro interference screw 1.8 (1.2–2.6) 1.9 (1.3–2.9)
 Rigidfix 0.6 (0.3–0.9) 0.9 (0.5–1.4)
 Other/unknown 1.1 (0.7–1.6) 1.0 (0.6–1.5)
a

Adjusted analysis model stratified for country (Sweden, Denmark, Norway) and adjusted for gender, age at surgery (5-year categories), activity at primary injury, and corresponding fixation in tibia or femur.