Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2018 Feb 12;54(4):510–518. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.017

Table 3.

Changes in Social-Emotional Wellness Scales From Baseline to 12 Weeks, by Intervention Assignment

Social-emotional wellness scales Adjusted mean change p-value Adjusted difference p-value

β (95% CI)
Peer relationships (N=482)
 3 days/week program 0.52 (−0.88, 1.93) 0.46 0.47 (−1.21, 2.16) 0.58
 2 days/week program 1.24 (0.26, 2.23) 0.01 1.20 (−0.15, 2.54) 0.08
 Controls 0.05 (−0.91, 1.01) 0.92 ref
Positive affect (N=449)
 3 days/week program 0.64 (−0.62, 1.90) 0.32 0.61 (−0.91, 2.12) 0.43
 2 days/week program 1.44 (0.52, 2.36) <0.01 1.41 (0.16, 2.65) 0.03
 Controls 0.04 (−0.84, 0.91) 0.94 ref
Life satisfaction (N=488)
 3 days/week program 0.65 (0.14, 1.17) 0.01 0.48 (−0.14, 1.11) 0.13
 2 days/week program −0.10 (−0.47, 0.26) 0.57 −0.27 (−0.78, 0.23) 0.29
 Controls 0.17 (−0.19, 0.53) 0.36 ref
Vitality/energy (N=511)
 3 days/week program −0.36 (−0.86, 0.14) 0.16 −0.39 (−0.99, 0.21) 0.20
 2 days/week program 0.63 (0.28, 0.98) <0.01 0.60 (0.11, 1.08) 0.02
 Controls 0.03 (−0.32, 0.38) 0.85 ref
Student engagement (N=500)
 3 days/week program 0.81 (0.13, 1.48) 0.02 0.79 (−0.01, 1.60) 0.05
 2 days/week program 0.47 (0.01, 0.93) 0.05 0.46 (−0.18, 1.10) 0.16
 Controls 0.01 (−0.44, 0.47) 0.95 ref

Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). Models are adjusted for school, age, sex, and baseline BMI.