Table 2. Coefficient estimates (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the best model (M8) explaining female wolf and grizzly bear movement rate in west-central Alberta, Canada, between 2003 and 2009.
| Wolves | Female grizzly bears | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | ±95% CI | β | ±95% CI | |
| log(Veght) | -0.386 | 1.110 | -0.434 | 0.614 |
| fSeason(Rendezvous|Summer)1 | 0.184 | 0.997 | -0.317 | 0.247 |
| fSeason(Nomadic|Fall)2 | 0.770 | 0.835 | -0.114 | 0.255 |
| fFor | -0.271 | 0.708 | 0.347 | 0.321 |
| log(Veght)*fSeason(Rendezvous|Summer)1 | 0.697 | 2.207 | 0.179 | 0.691 |
| log(Veght)*fSeason(Nomadic|Fall)2 | -0.237 | 0.674 | 0.742 | 0.363 |
| log(Veght)* fForest | 2.109 | 1.111 | 0.151 | 0.707 |
| fFor*fSeason(Rendezvous|Summer)1 | 2.041 | 0.876 | -0.057 | 0.372 |
| fFor*fSeason(Nomadic|Fall)2 | -0.673 | 1.482 | -0.303 | 0.373 |
| log(Veght)*fFor*fSeason(Rendezvous|Summer)1 | -4.189 | 3.063 | -0.054 | 0.816 |
| log(Veght)*fFor*fSeason(Nomadic|Fall)2 | -1.695 | 2.331 | -0.240 | 0.853 |
Significant relationships are shown in bold. Denning and Spring were the reference categories for fSeason for wolves, and grizzly bears respectively. Variables are described in S1 Table.
1 Results for wolves are for the Rendezvous season, and results for grizzly bears are for the Summer season.
2 Results for wolves are for the Nomadic season, and results for grizzly bears are for the Fall season.