Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 16.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2015 Jan 19;45:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.022

Table 3.

Fit indices for the original and modified models.

Age Description CFI TLI RMSEA [95% CI] χ2
Opioid misuse
12–14 Original model .972 .931 .035 [.029–.041] χ2 (10) = 109.73, p < .001
Alternative model .949 .873 .047 [.041–.053] χ2 (10) = 192.66, p < .001
15–17 Original model .974 .935 .027 [.022–.033] χ2 (10) = 75.92, p < .001
Alternative model .830 .574 .069 [.063–.074] χ2 (10) = 439.23, p < .001
Stimulant misuse
Age Description CFI TLI RMSEA [95% CI] χ2
12–14 Original model .979 .943 .031 [.025–.037] χ2 (9) = 79.58, p < .001
Alternative model .978 .946 .030 [.024–.036] χ2 (9) = 83.87, p < .001
15–17 Original model .975 .930 .027 [.021–.033] χ2 (9) = 69.13, p < .001
Alternative model .860 .651 .061 [.055–.066] χ2 (9) = 341.74, p < .001

Note. The original models reflect those presented in Figs. 1 and 2. In the alternative models, parental warmth and monitoring were switched with attitudes and social ties in the mediation chain.