Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;33(Suppl 1):61–70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4327-8

Table 4.

Summary of Results: Minimal Important Difference (MID)

Measure Range Number of studies N per
study
(ref)
Minimal important difference (MID)
Estimated using a clinical anchor Estimated using statistical approaches
ROC/optimal cutoff 95% limit cutoff Average change among responders Change difference, responders vs. non-responders Minimal detectable change Smallest detectable difference SEM*
Oswestry Disability Index 0–100 3 4759 4.0 8.2 8.3 2.0
6355 7.5 16.7
10745 10.7§
Visual Analog Scale 0–10 mm 1 4759 3.0 3.2 2.0 2.2
Visual Analog Scale 0–100 mm 1 11869 49#
Bodily Pain Index 0–10 2 20550 0.6
22250 0.7
PEG 0–10 2 20550 1.8
22250 1.9
Chronic Pain Grade-intensity 0–100 2 20550 9.0
22250 9.9
Chronic Pain Grade-disability 0–100 2 20550 8.7
22250 10.3
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire 0–24 4 6355 3.5 4.9
20550 1.0
22250 1.2
14334 7.5
SF-36 Bodily Pain Scale 0–100 2 20550 9.8
22250 11.8
Numeric Rating Scale 0–10 3 6355 4.0 2.4
13537 3.5 4.7
13868 2.5 3.7 4.5

*Standard error of measurement

†Estimated by the upper value of the 95% confidence interval for average change score seen in the cohort defined by anchor to be non-responders

‡Estimated by 1.96 × square root of 2 × SEM test-retest

§SEM determined from participants classified as stable. The SEM was then used to calculate the 90% CI and then multiplied by the square root of 2

#Estimated by the standard deviation of the difference values × 1.96