GEM2000; Paiva et al.14
|
Day 100 post-ASCT |
MFC |
MRD negativity associated with improved PFS and OS |
GEM2000/GEM2005; Paiva et al.15
|
Day 100 post-ASCT |
MFC |
MRD positivity associated with loss of CR status |
MRC Myeloma IX; Rawstron et al.16
|
Day 100 post-ASCT |
MFC |
MRD negativity associated with improved PFS and OS |
MRC Myeloma IX; de Tute et al.17
|
Post-induction |
MFC |
Impact of MRD negativity is independent of induction regimen |
IFM 2009; Attal et al.3
|
Post-consolidation or post-maintenance |
MFC |
MRD negativity associated with improved PFS |
IFM 2009; Avet-Loiseau et al.34
|
Post-maintenance |
NGS |
MRD negativity associated with improved 3-yr PFS |
Chakraborty et al.18
|
Day 100 post-ASCT |
MFC |
MRD negativity associated with improved PFS and OS |
GEM05>65y; Paiva et al.19
|
Post-induction, ASCT ineligible |
MFC |
MRD negativity associated with improved PFS |
PETHEMA/GEM trials; Lahuerta et al.20
|
Nine months post-enrollment |
MFC |
MRD negativity associated with improved PFS and OS |
Paiva et al.22
|
Relapsed/refractory |
MFC |
MRD negativity associated with improved TTP |
POLLUX; Dimopoulos et al.23
|
Relapsed/refractory |
NGS |
MRD negativity associated with improved PFS |
POLLUX/CASTOR; Avet-Loiseau et al.37
|
Relapsed/refractory |
NGS |
MRD negativity associated with fewer PFS events |
EMN02/HO95; Oliva et al.24
|
Prior to maintenance |
MFC |
MRD negativity associated with improved 3-yr PFS |