Table 5.
Association of NC with visceral obesity: logistic regression
| NC (cm) | Male | NC (cm) | Female | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
| Q1 (≤34) | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | Q1 (≤30) | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Q2 (34–36) | 2.73 (2.12–3.53) | 2.80 (2.13–3.69) | Q2 (30–32) | 3.20 (2.72–3.78) | 3.20 (2.66–3.86) |
| Q3 (36–38) | 8.29 (6.47–10.62) | 8.19 (6.26–10.71) | Q3 (32–33) | 7.63 (6.22–9.36) | 8.37 (6.63–10.58) |
| Q4 (> 38) | 31.00 (23.64–40.65) | 32.34 (24.02–43.53) | Q4 (> 33) | 19.85 (16.48–23.92) | 21.43 (17.30–26.55) |
| P for trend | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | P for trend | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
The data were expressed as the odds ratio (95% confidence interval). NC neck circumference
Model 1 did not adjust for any factors;
Model 2 adjusted for age, smoking, drinking, HbA1c, TC, LDL and SBP