Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;2018:2525670. doi: 10.1155/2018/2525670

Table 2.

Stroop test results when comparing maltodextrin (placebo) versus glutamine dipeptide (GDP) supplementation before and after an acute resistance training session (n = 10). Values expressed as mean ± and standard deviation.

Placebo GDP Effects F P
T_latency: A-B (seconds) ANOVA
Pre 1.6 ± 3.7 2.3 ± 3.2 Supplement 0.01 0.93
Post 2.6 ± 2.0 2.1 ± 2.1 Time 0.34 0.57
Supplement × time 0.97 0.34
T_latency: B-C (seconds) ANOVA
Pre 7.0 ± 7.1 7.9 ± 7.0 Supplement 0.05 0.83
Post 5.2 ± 4.7 3.3 ± 3.1 Time 11.60 <0.01
Supplement × time 0.97 0.34
T_latency: A-C (seconds) ANOVA
Pre 8.6 ± 7.5 10.2 ± 6.2 Supplement 0.03 0.87
Post 7.7 ± 5.3 5.4 ± 3.6 Time 13.44 <0.01
Supplement × time 6.28 0.02
Card: A (seconds) ANOVA
Pre 15.2 ± 3.6 15.2 ± 1.9 Supplement 0.49 0.49
Post 13.2 ± 2.0 14.5 ± 1.8 Time 8.02 0.01
Supplement × time 1.41 0.25
Card: B (seconds) ANOVA
Pre 16.8 ± 3.8 17.6 ± 3.7 Supplement 0.29 0.60
Post 15.6 ± 3.3 16.5 ± 2.8 Time 7.18 0.01
Supplement × time 0.01 0.98
Card: C (seconds) ANOVA
Pre 23.8 ± 9.4 25.5 ± 7.5 Supplement 0.01 0.93
Post 20.9 ± 6.4 19.8 ± 4.9 Time 25.59 <0.01
Supplement × time 2.66 0.12

P < 0,01 versus Pre; T_latency = Time of Latency.