Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Indoor Air. 2018 Jan 24;28(3):360–372. doi: 10.1111/ina.12447

Table 5.

Summary of Previous Studies Evaluating Filtration Effects on Biomarker Outcomes in Healthy Adults

Study Intervention
Duration
Purifier Type Pollution
Decrease
Biomarkers Improved with
Intervention
Chuang et al. 2017[31] 2 × 1y; no washout House AC electret filter (MERV11/F6; non-HEPA) PM2.5: 8.6 µg/m3 (40%) SBP, DBP, 8-OHdG, & CRP
Pádro-Martínez et al. 2015[41] 2 × 21d; no washout Window-mounted HEPA PNC: 4900 #/cm3 (42%) None
Chen et al. 2015[42] 2 × 48h; 2w washout Portable electret filter (non-HEPA) PM2.5: 55 µg/m3 (57%) SBP, DBP, sCD40L, FeNO, MCP-1, IL-1β, & MPO
Kajbafzadeh et al. 2015[43] 2 × 7d; no washout Portable HEPA + activated carbon PM2.5: 2.8 µg/m3 (40%) None
Karottki et al. 2013[44] 2 × 14d; no washout House AHU H11 HEPA PM2.5: 3.8 µg/m3 (50%) Monocyte CD62L (only on Day 2 of intervention)
Weichenthal et al. 2013[45] 2 × 7d; 1w washout Portable electret filter (non-HEPA) PM2.5: 37 µg/m3 (~60%)a FEV1 & PEFR (both dependent on two outlying subjects)
Allen et al. 2011[46] 2 × 7d; no washout Portable HEPA PM2.5: 6.2 µg/m3 (~60%)a Reactive hyperemia index (RHI); Males only: CRP, IL-6, & band cell counts
Bräuner et al. 2008[47] 2 × 48h; no washout Portable HEPA PM2.5: 7.9 µg/m3 (~60%)a RHI & hemoglobin
a

Exact percentage not given, but was instead approximated from the published data