Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Feb 9;51(4):363–367. doi: 10.1002/eat.22839

Table 2.

Correlations Between Criterion Variables (Appearance Satisfaction and Disordered Eating) and SATAQ-4R Internalization: Thin/Low Body Fat Subscale and Ideal Body Stereotype Scale-Revised (IBSS-R) Using a Bifactor Model (n = 1094)

Bifactor Model

Criterion
Variable
General
ωHierarchical = .62
SATAQ-4R
ωHierarchical Subscale = .37
IBSS-R
ωHierarchical Subscale = .39
Appearance Satisfactiona ω = .91 −.36*** (.04) −.30*** (.04) −.06 ns (.04)
Restraintb ω = .85 .35*** (.04) .36*** (.04) .15*** (.04)
Eating Concernc ω = .84 .40*** (.04) .34*** (.04) .09* (.04)
Shape Concernd ω = .92 .43*** (.04) .43*** (.04) .24*** (.04)
Weight Concerne ω = .88 .40*** (.04) .40*** (.04) .23*** (.04)
Note. Composite reliability or omega (ω) was computed for the criterion variables from the one-factor confirmatory factor analysis model for each scale.
ω=(i=1pλij)2(i=1pλij)2+i=1pθii
where λij is the standardized factor loading of item i on factor j and θ is the standardized unique variance of the item.13
ω Hierarchical=(λ General)2(λ General)2+(λ SATAQ)2+(λ IBSS)2+(1h2)
ω Hierarchical Subscale for SATAQ=(λ SATAQ)2(λ General)2+(λ SATAQ)2+(1h2)
The standardized parameter estimates for the four SATAQ items (general and specific factor loadings and unique variance) are used in the computations.
ω Hierarchical Subscale for IBSS=(λ IBSS)2(λ General)2+(λ IBSS)2+(1h2)
The standardized parameter estimates for the six IBSS items (general and specific factor loadings and unique variance) are used in the computations.22
a

A parameter estimating the correlation between the errors for MBSRQ-AE 1 and MBSRQ-AE 3 was added to the model.

b

A parameter estimating the correlation between the errors for EDEQ 2 and EDEQ 5 was added to the model.

c

A parameter estimating the correlation between the errors for EDEQ 19 and EDEQ 21 was added to the model.

d

A parameter estimating the correlation between the errors for EDEQ 27 and EDEQ 28 was added to the model.

e

A parameter estimating the correlation between the errors for EDEQ 8 and EDEQ 25 was added to the model.

*

p < .05.

***

p < .001.

ns = not statistically signifi