Table 3.
Study | Comparison | IES (means) | CROPS (means) | PROPS (means) | CAPS (means) | PENN (means) | DISC-PTSD symptoms | TSCC-dissociation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edmond et al., 1999 | Routine individual treatment | Post-treatment EMDR 14.1 vs. 14 Follow-up EMDR 10.3 vs. 18 Effect size 0.56 |
||||||
Delayed EMDR | Post-treatment EMDR 14.1 vs. 32.1* |
|||||||
Jaberghaderi et al., 2004 | CBT | Post-treatment EMDR 18.86 vs. 22.71 |
Post-treatment EMDR 10.14 vs. 11.29 |
|||||
Farkas et al., 2010 | Routine individual/ group therapy | Post-treatment EMDR 0.3 vs. 1.4* Follow-up EMDR 0.4 vs. 1.3 |
Post-treatment EMDR 2.2 vs. 4.6* Follow-up EMDR 2.9 vs. 3.3 |
|||||
Scheck et al., 1998 | Active listening | Post-treatment EMDR 23.43 vs. 36.41* Effect size 0.83 Follow-up EMDR 15.88 vs. 26.16 |
Post-treatment EMDR 20.36 vs. 31.22* Effect size 0.72 |
|||||
Soberman et al., 2002 | Treatment as usual | Post-treatment (mean change in scores) EMDR −5.5 vs. −5.73 Follow-up EMDR −12.83 vs. −6.78 |
Post-treatment (mean change in scores) EMDR −4 vs. −3.36 Follow-up EMDR −8.83 vs. −4 |
Post-treatment (mean change in scores) EMDR −5.40 vs. −0.73* Follow-up EMDR −2.33 vs. −2 |
||||
van der Kolk et al., 2007 | Pill Placebo | Post-treatment EMDR 38.36 vs. 46.57* |
||||||
Fluoxetine | Post-treatment EMDR 38.36 vs. 40.20 Follow up EMDR 33 vs. 50.43 |
indicate statistically significant findings.