Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 11;9:534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00534

Table 3.

Results from included studies for measures of PTSD symptoms.

Study Comparison IES (means) CROPS (means) PROPS (means) CAPS (means) PENN (means) DISC-PTSD symptoms TSCC-dissociation
Edmond et al., 1999 Routine individual treatment Post-treatment
EMDR 14.1 vs. 14
Follow-up
EMDR 10.3 vs. 18
Effect size 0.56
Delayed EMDR Post-treatment
EMDR 14.1 vs. 32.1*
Jaberghaderi et al., 2004 CBT Post-treatment
EMDR 18.86 vs. 22.71
Post-treatment
EMDR 10.14 vs. 11.29
Farkas et al., 2010 Routine individual/ group therapy Post-treatment
EMDR 0.3 vs. 1.4*
Follow-up
EMDR 0.4 vs. 1.3
Post-treatment
EMDR 2.2 vs. 4.6*
Follow-up
EMDR 2.9 vs. 3.3
Scheck et al., 1998 Active listening Post-treatment
EMDR 23.43 vs. 36.41*
Effect size 0.83
Follow-up
EMDR 15.88 vs. 26.16
Post-treatment
EMDR 20.36 vs. 31.22*
Effect size 0.72
Soberman et al., 2002 Treatment as usual Post-treatment
(mean change in scores)
EMDR −5.5 vs. −5.73
Follow-up
EMDR −12.83 vs. −6.78
Post-treatment
(mean change in scores)
EMDR −4 vs. −3.36
Follow-up
EMDR −8.83 vs. −4
Post-treatment
(mean change in scores)
EMDR −5.40 vs. −0.73*
Follow-up
EMDR −2.33 vs. −2
van der Kolk et al., 2007 Pill Placebo Post-treatment
EMDR 38.36 vs. 46.57*
Fluoxetine Post-treatment
EMDR 38.36 vs. 40.20
Follow up
EMDR 33 vs. 50.43
*

indicate statistically significant findings.