Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2015 Sep 1;14(10):4147–4157. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00200

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Use of EN method to evaluate the effects of different experimental strategies and parameters on precision (i.e., within-group variability, CV %) and quantitative accuracy(i.e., deviation from true ratio, 0 at log 2 scale). (A,B) Effects of different quantitative strategies including ion current (IC)-based methods (median-IC, LMM-IC, and Sum-IC) and MS2-based methods (MS2-TIC and SpC). (C,D) Effects of the quality of chromatographic separation and (E,F) effects of database selection.