Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2018 Mar;32(2):186–196. doi: 10.1037/fam0000376

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics and Equivalence of Treatment and Control Groups (N = 692 individuals)

Treatment (n =344)
Control (n =348)
Test Statisticd Entire Sample
Mean SD Mean SD Range (W1) Alpha (W1, W2)
Demographic Characteristics
Marrieda 0.65 NA 0.61 NA 0.58
Children in home 3.12 1.54 2.86 1.43 0.13 1 – 12
Incomeb 1.71 1.47 1.60 1.33 0.72 0 – 10
Education 5.48 1.84 5.46 1.66 0.15 1 – 10
Age 38.12 8.64 38.25 8.87 0.15 21 – 83
Study Variables
Financial hardship 5.56 2.03 5.26 1.90 1.98* 2.00 – 10.00 .69, .70
Racial Discrimination 16.39 6.00 16.11 6.21 0.59 9.00 – 36.00 .91, .92
Relationship communication −0.07 5.74 0.07 5.32 0.28 −15.80 – 9.76 .84, .90
Relationship satisfaction 24.48 4.92 25.14 4.03 1.36 6.00 – 30.00 .92, .96
Relationship confidence 17.30 3.34 17.61 2.94 1.18 4.00 – 20.00 .89, .92
Depressive Symptoms 11.84 7.95 11.28 7.73 1.14 0.00 – 48.00 .82, .83
Self-reported health c 12.14 2.40 12.30 2.26 0.81 5.00 – 16.00 .69, .68

Note. W1 = Wave 1; W2 = Wave 2. W3 = Wave 3.

a

1 = Married (0 = Cohabiting).

b

Monthly income divided by 1,000.

c

Not assessed at W1; wave 2 assessment for descriptive statistics, and W2 and W3 for Cronbach’s alpha (n = 579).

d

T-test for continuous and ordinal variables; chi-square cross-tab statistic for binary variables.

*

p ≤ .05, two-tailed