. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2018 Mar;32(2):186–196. doi: 10.1037/fam0000376

Table 4.

– Summary of models examining ProSAAF stress-buffering effects

	Rel. Satisfaction (N=578)			Rel. Confidence (N=692)
	B (β)	se	p	B (β)	se	p
	Dependent Variable: Wave 2 Mechanism
Financial Hardship	−0.37 (−.14)^*	.15	.01	−0.33 (−.19)^**	.12	<.01
ProSAAF ^a	−0.78 (−.08)	1.12	.48	0.69 (.10)^*	.28	.02
Financial Hardship × ProSAAF	0.35 (.21)	.21	.09	0.40 (.17)^**	.15	<.01
Racial Discrimination	−0.03 (−.04)	.03	.27	−0.01 (−.01)	.02	.72
Sex	0.46 (.05)	.30	.13	0.28 (.04)	.24	.24
W1 Mechanism	0.55 (.49)^**	.06	.00	0.43 (.40)^**	.07	.00
	Dependent Variable: W3 Self-report Health
W2 Mechanism	0.04 (.09)^**	.02	.01	0.10 (.14)^**	.02	<.01
Financial Hardship	0.00 (.00)	.06	.99	−0.00 (−.00)	.06	.98
ProSAAF^a	−0.26 (−.01)	.42	.95	−0.09 (−.02)	.15	.56
Financial Hardship × ProSAAF	−0.01 (−.02)	.08	.88	−0.02 (−.01)	.08	.79
Racial Discrimination	−0.02 (−.05)	.01	.15	−0.02 (−.05)	.01	.14
Sex	0.19 (.04)	.15	.21	0.18 (.04)	.15	.21
Self-report Health (W2)	0.61 (.65)^**	.06	.00	0.63 (.64)^**	.04	.00

Note:

1 = ProSAAF assignment. Individual correlations between predictor variables not detailed for clarity purposes. Model fit statistics: Relationship Satisfaction Model: χ²(2) = 2.31; p = .31. CFI = 1.00. RMSEA = 0.02, p = .70. Relationship Confidence Model: χ²(7) = 21.78; p < .01. CFI = 0.96. RMSEA = 0.06, p = .33.

^**

p ≤ .01;

p ≤ .05 (two-tailed tests).