Table 2. Summary of sampling data and results obtained by lipl32 and 16S rRNA qPCR (presence/absence and concentration) for the three sites investigated.
lipl32 | 16S rRNA | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site | N of samples | Positive samples | Concentrationa | Positive samples | Concentrationa | Agreementb | |
Soil | A | 34 | 9 (26%) | 4 (4–17.8) | 30 (88%) | 2.13×102 (4–2.91×103) | 0.09 ± 0.05 Poor |
B | 14 | 3 (21%) | 13 (4–4.31×102) | 8 (57%) | 96 (19–1.20×103) | 0.34 ± 0.18 Fair | |
C | 22 | 10 (45%) | 24 (4–4.09×102) | 22 (100%) | 6.95×102 (88.5–2.57×104) | 0.00 ± 0.00 Poor | |
All | 70 | 22 (31%) | 6 (4–4.31×102) | 60 (86%) | 4.16×102 (4–2.57×104) | 0.14 ± 0.05 Poor | |
Sewage | C | 8 | 7 (88%) | 0.5 (0.5–0.9) | 8 (100%) | 2.09×102 (97.7–2.81×102) | 0.00 ± 0.00 Poor |
aMedian concentration and range (GEq/g or GEq/mL)
bCohen’s kappa coefficient between qualitative lipl32 and 16S rRNA qPCR results, standard error and strength of agreement.