Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar;10(3):1797–1805. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.14

Table 1. Comparison between patients with low vs. high FEV1/FVC ratios.

Variables All (n=74) FEV1/FVC ratio ≥0.74 (n=24) FEV1/FVC ratio <0.74 (n=50) P
Age, years 0.68
   ≤65 36 (49%) 13 (54%) 23 (46%)
   >65 38 (51%) 11 (46%) 27 (54%)
Sex 0.02
   Female 10 (13%) 7 (29%) 3 (6%)
   Male 64 (87%) 17 (71%) 47 (94%)
ECOG PS score 0.37
   0 20 (27%) 5 (21%) 15 (30%)
   1 44 (59%) 17 (71%) 27 (54%)
   2 10 (14%) 2 (8%) 8 (16%)
Smoking history 0.23
   No 9 (12%) 5 (21%) 4 (8%)
   Yes 65 (88%) 19 (79%) 46 (92%)
Chemotherapy cycle 0.16
   <4 6 (8%) 4 (17%) 2 (8%)
   ≥4 68 (92%) 20 (83%) 48 (92%)
Sequential CRT 0.40
   No 61 (82%) 18 (75%) 43 (86%)
   Yes 13 (18%) 6 (25%) 7 (14%)
RT fractionation 0.28
   Once daily 12 (16%) 6 (25%) 6 (12%)
   Twice daily 62 (84%) 18 (75%) 44 (88%)
Complete response 1.00
   No 32 (43%) 10 (42%) 22 (44%)
   Yes 42 (57%) 14 (58%) 28 (56%)
PCI 1.00
   No 40 (54%) 13 (54%) 27 (54%)
   Yes 34 (46%) 11 (46%) 23 (46%)

FEV1, pretreatment forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; RT, radiotherapy; PCI, prophylactic cranial irradiation