Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar;10(3):1797–1805. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.14

Table 2. Comparison of treatment outcome, tumor volume, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio between low and high pulmonary function parameters divided by the cutoff values determined via maximal log-rank tests.

Variables FEV1/FVC ratio FEV1 (% of predicted) FVC (% of predicted)
≥0.74 <0.74 P ≥76 <76 P ≥91 <91 P
N=74 24 50 31 43 18 56
   Death 0.01 0.04 0.01
    No 15 (63%) 14 (28%) 17 (55%) 12 (28%) 12 (67%) 17 (30%)
    Yes 9 (38%) 36 (72%) 14 (45%) 31 (72%) 6 (33%) 39 (70%)
   Progression 0.01 0.10 0.94
    No 11 (46%) 7 (14%) 11 (35%) 7 (16%) 5 (28%) 13 (23%)
    Yes 13 (54%) 43 (86%) 20 (65%) 36 (84%) 13 (72%) 43 (77%)
   Local progression 0.36 0.39 0.03
    No 15 (63%) 24 (48%) 14 (45%) 25 (58%) 5 (28%) 34 (61%)
    Yes 9 (38%) 26 (52%) 17 (55%) 18 (42%) 13 (72%) 22 (39%)
   Distant progression 0.20 0.01 0.01
    No 20 (83%) 33 (66%) 28 (90%) 25 (58%) 18 (100%) 35 (63%)
    Yes 4 (17%) 17 (34%) 3 (10%) 18 (42%) 0 (0%) 21 (38%)
N=70 22 48 29 41 18 52
   Tumor volume (cc), mean ± SD 145±111 123±103 0.42 109±98 146±108 0.14 101±109 141±103 0.17
N=69 20 49 28 51 17 52
   Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, mean ± SD 2.6±1.9 2.5±1.3 0.86 2±0.9 2.9±1.6 <0.01 1.9±0.9 2.7±1.6 0.01

FEV1, pretreatment forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; SD, standard deviation.