Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar;10(3):1476–1482. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.177

Table 3. Comparing the CHA2DS2-VASc and CHADS2 scoring systems in study group.

Scoring systems Mean SD Categories
Low-intermediate risk, <2 points High risk, ≥2 points
CHADS2 2±1.4 49 (44.5%) 61 (55.4%)
CHA2DS2-VASc 3.6±1.8 13 (11.6%) 97 (88.1%)

P<0.001, χ2=29.106. The proportion of patients in high-risk category (≥2 points) was significantly higher for CHA2DS2-VASc than that of CHADS2 score.