Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 18;95(2):179–187. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0203-9

Table 3.

Multiple regression models measuring the influence of group type on HIV risk measures

Completely unprotected sex Condomless anal sex Aggregate risk
OR (95% CI) Chi square P value OR (95% CI) Chi square P value β P value
Age 10.22 0.0167 12.99 0.0047 0.4973
 18–29 1.98 (1.10–3.56) 2.22 (1.26–3.92) 0.07
 30–39 2.50 (1.41–4.45) 2.76 (1.57–4.85) 0.16
 40–49 1.54 (0.81–2.90) 2.03 (1.10–3.77) 0.05
 50+a
Race 4.74 0.0294 2.11 0.1460 0.1377
 Black, Latino, or other racea
 White 1.61 (1.05–2.46) 1.36 (0.90–2.04) 0.08
Income 1.14 0.7679 0.55 0.9070 0.7529
 <15 K 0.97 (0.53–1.77) 1.02 (0.58–1.82) 0.06
 15–29 K 1.25 (0.72–2.16) 1.21 (0.71–2.07) 0.09
 30–49 K 1.20 (0.72–2.01) 1.07 (0.65–1.78) −0.04
 50 K+a
Education 3.53 0.3172 4.61 0.2029 0.2011
 College graduate 0.49 (0.14–1.69) 0.67 (0.20–2.29) −0.24
 Some college 0.57 (0.16–1.96) 0.67 (0.20–2.32) −0.17
 High school 0.37 (0.10–1.32) 0.40 (0.11–1.42) −0.35
 Less than high schoola
Group type 6.54 0.0882 10.64 0.0138 0.1012
 Named family 0.45 (0.22–0.89) 0.41 (0.21–0.80) −0.26
 Non-named family 0.92 (0.50–1.72) 1.11 (0.61–2.00) 0.02
 Other social group 1.26 (0.74–2.17) 1.53 (0.91–2.60) 0.02
 Nonea

Note: Significant values at the 0.05 level are shown in italics

aDenotes referent group