Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 14;95(2):159–170. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0227-9

Table 3.

Logistic regression and odds ratios for primary risk behavior outcomes comparing the intervention (MILE) to the control arms at 3-month follow-up, controlling for baselinea

Dichotomous outcomes Odds ratios (95% CI) complete caseb Odds ratios (95% CI) limited sampleb
Any sex without condoms (prior 3 months) 1.74 (0.70, 4.36) 2.22 (0.90, 5.47)
Any sex with females without condoms (prior 3 months) 1.43 (0.48, 4.24) 2.03 (0.67, 6.29)
Any sex with males without condoms (prior 3 months) 1.26 (0.53, 2.99) 1.54 (0.65, 3.67)
Any sex partner at follow-up (prior 3 months) 2.49 (1.09, 5.71) 2.21 (0.86, 5.67)
Any female partner at follow-up (prior 3 months) 1.76 (0.73, 4.23) 1.42 (0.60, 3.34)
Any male partner at follow-up (prior 3 months) 1.59 (0.61, 4.10) 1.67 (0.60, 4.49)

MILE Men in Life Environments

aLogistic regression models controlled for length of time between baseline and follow-up interviews and baseline values for current employment, level of education, the proctor conducting the interview, and whether the interview was conducted in the final phase of follow-up data collection. Models also accounted for clustering within groups

bAnalyses were conducted both as a complete case design as well as excluding cases (n = 55) collected during final phase of follow-up. These cases were known to have been interviewed in field settings at follow-up