Table 2.

Rate of survival, success, and complications of the studies included

Author	Overall survival (%)	1-Year survival (%)	5-Year survival (%)	10-Year survival (%)	Success (%)	Ankylosis (%)	Root resorption (%)	Pulp necrosis (%)
Mertens et al. [31]	96	96	96	96	61.1	14.3	22.2	16.7
Nagori et al. [3]	95.6	95.6	–	–	86.7	–	11.1	2.2
Nagori et al. [4]	92.3	92.3	–	–	92.3	–	–	7.7
de Carvalho et al. [37]	75	100	100	100	–	–	–	–
Plakwicz et al. [5]	100	100	–	–	91.3	4.3	–	0
Schütz et al. [6]	94.7	94.7	–	–	94.7	0	–	3.5
Shahbazian et al. [33]	100	100	–	–	91.7	5	0	5
Mendoza-Mendoza et al. [7]	83.3	100	100	83.3	80	–	16.7	16.7
Isa-Kara et al. [8]	100	100	–	–	100	0	–	0
Vilhjálmsson et al. [9]	–	–	–	–	84.6	–	15.4	0
Gonnissen et al. [10]	–	–	–	–	70.6	–	–	–
Mensink and van Merkesteyn [11]	100	100	–	–	–	4.8	0	3.2
Yan et al. [12]	100	100	100	–	100	–	0	12.5
Díaz et al. [13]	100	100	–	–	–	0	10	40
Tanaka et al. [45]	100	100	100	–	100	–	–	–
Jonsson and Sigurdsson [14]	97.1	100	100	97.1	91.9	0	5.7	34.3
Myrlund et al. [46]	98.6	100	–	–	90.5	–	–	–
Bauss et al. [15]	100	100	–	–	84.2	5.3	–	9.2
Czochrowska et al. [16]	90.9	100	100	93.9	78.8	12.1	–	–
Czochrowska et al. [2]	100	100	–	–	93	2.2	4.4	–
Josefsson et al. [17]	98	98	–	–	91.9	3	–	–
Lundberg and Isaksson [18]	95.6	95.6	–	–	94.1	2.9	0.5	3.4
Marcusson and Lilja-Karlander [19]	85.2	96.2	88.9	–	–	0	6.5	0
Kugelberg et al. [20]	100	100	–	–	95.7	0	0	–
Schatz and Joho [21]	100	100	100	–	92.5	–	3.3	7.5
Kristerson and Lagerstrom [22]	–	–	–	–	90.2	–	–	–
Andreasen et al. [30]	99	100	99.1	99.1	–	–	–	7.4
Andreasen et al. [35]	–	–	–	–	–	3.6	3.3	–
Hernandez and Cuestascarnero [23]	100	100	–	–	100	0	0	–
Kristerson [24]	95.4	–	–	–	–	6.9	3.4	11.5
Borring-Møller et al. [25]	100	100	–	–	–	0	0	–
Slagsvold and Bjercke [1]	100	100	100	–	–	–	–	–