Table 3.
Annual estimated weighted survival rates, success rates, ankylosis rates, root resorption rates, and necrotic pulp rates obtained from meta-analysis
| Survival rate | |
| Overall (CI 95%) | 98.2% (96.4–99.1%) |
| Premolar donor teeth (CI 95%) Molar donor teeth (CI 95%) |
98.4% (96.3–99.4%) 97.2% (93.9–98.8%)a |
| The maxilla as recipient site (CI 95%) | a |
| The mandible as recipient site (CI 95%) | 98.1% (86.7–99.7%) |
| The incisor region as recipient site (CI 95%) | a |
| The premolar region as recipient site (CI 95%) | 98.6% (95.4–99.6%) |
| The molar region as recipient site (CI 95%) | 97.3% (93.6–98.9%) |
| Success rate | |
| Overall (CI 95%) | 98.6% (94.8–97.8%) |
| Canine donor teeth (CI 95%) | 97.7% (73.6–99.8%) |
| Premolar donor teeth (CI 95%) Molar donor teeth (CI 95%) |
98.1% (95.5–99.2%) 95.5% (92.0–97.5%) |
| The maxilla as recipient site (CI 95%) | 98.5% (94.5–99.6%) |
| The mandible as recipient site (CI 95%) | 97.3% (92.7–99.1%) |
| The incisor region as recipient site (CI 95%) | 98.5% (93.8–99.7%) |
| The canine region as recipient site (CI 95%) | 97.7% (73.6–99.8%) |
| The premolar region as recipient site (CI 95%) | 97.8% (93.6–99.3%) |
| The molar region as recipient site (CI 95%) | 95.1% (90.8–97.4%) |
| Ankylosis rate | |
| Overall (CI 95%) | 2.0% (1.1–3.7%) |
| Premolar donor teeth (CI 95%) Molar donor teeth (CI 95%) |
1.9% (0.8–4.7%) 2.2% (0.7–6.3%) |
| Root resorption rate | |
| Overall (CI 95%) | 2.9% (1.5–5.5%) |
| Premolar donor teeth (CI 95%) Molar donor teeth (CI 95%) |
1.5% (0.5–4.7%) 5.0% (2.1–11.7%) |
| Pulp necrosis rate | |
| Overall (CI 95%) | 3.3% (1.9–5.6%) |
| Premolar donor teeth (CI 95%) Molar donor teeth (CI 95%) |
4.4% (2.0–9.3%) 2.5% (1.0–5.9%) |
Articles included are different for each meta-analysis and can be found in Appendix C
aIt was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis because all articles had a survival rate of 100%