Table 2.

Comparison of foot assessment parameters in the study patients

Tested parameter	F1			F2			Student’s t test
	Mean	Median	Standard deviation	Mean	Median	Standard deviation	t	p
Foot load	36.00	34.75	6.54	37.23	36.50	6.01	− 3.3510	0.0011
L	224.85	227.00	12.83	225.66	227.00	12.67	− 2.1726	0.0319
W	86.59	86.00	6.25	87.01	88.00	6.02	− 0.9067	0.3664
Foot L/W	2.61	2.62	0.18	2.60	2.60	0.15	0.7638	0.4466
ALPFA	8.35	7.60	5.50	8.48	7.80	5.38	− 0.2760	0.7830
BETA	15.91	15.45	7.73	15.76	14.95	8.62	0.1762	0.8604
GAMMA	15.32	15,05	2.73	15.64	15.40	4.71	− 0.7354	0.4636
KY	0.27	0.20	0.24	0.29	0.30	0.25	− 0.5979	0.5511
CL	51.42	52.80	13.82	52.26	54.90	12.94	− 0.7726	0.4413
HW	51.23	51.45	4.83	51.46	51.05	5.65	− 0.6747	0.5012
FA	61.79	61.50	24.49	61.98	63.00	24.40	− 0.1750	0.8614

F1 foot on the operated breast side, F2 foot on the contralateral side, L foot length, W foot width, L/W Wejsflog index, ALPHA hallux valgus angle, BETA little toe varus angle, GAMMA heel angle, KY Sztriter–Godunov index, CL Clarke’s angle, HW heel width, WFA weighted foot area, p calculated probability value